Abstract R & D Background Purpose & Design Action Plan Findings & Analysis Implications Remarks
> Purpose & Design

I. Topic of the project

Using data to effect changes in the writing curriculum

II. Purposes of the project

  • To use the data collected from various sources and stakeholders to inform teaching and learning and effect changes in the writing curriculum
  • To investigate the impact of the curriculum changes on students' writing skills

III. Strategies used

Data collection and analysis
As McLean (1995) states, the "implementation of a complete program of data collection and use can lead to the improvement of education." The process of data collection and use can help bring about changes in the curriculum. Such process is a cycle involving "acting, observing, and reflecting" (Holly et al, 2005) and should occur throughout rather than at the end of a study. "Interim analysis" (Huberman and Miles, 1998 and Hendricks, 2006) is important as part of ongoing reflective planning.

Multiple forms of data, including "artifacts", "observational data" and "inquiry data" (see again Hendricks, 2006) should be gathered for analysis. Then, a process of triangulation should be used to cross-check the different forms of data and ensure valid results.

Using pre-writing, revising and editing
"Pre-writing is a way of stimulating students' interest and, provide the basis for writing" (English Section & Institute of Language in Education, 1994). If appropriate support is given at this warm-up stage, the problems students encounter in writing can be addressed and students can write in an unthreatening atmosphere.

Walshe (1981) described writing as "potter's clay" which "only becomes a thing of usefulness or beauty through repeated smoothing and shaping".With supportive guidance, students can refine their work at the reviewing and editing stages. "Reading and responding" (White & Arnt, 1991) is a strategy which can help them review and edit their work.

As mentioned, the P3 teachers realised the importance of using a variety of data to identify students' needs. With reference to the school context, the P3 teachers collected a variety of data:

The data was analysed to help the teachers make informed decisions in a spiraling process.


IV. Design of the Project

The project was launched in December 2005 and lasted over a span of two terms. Process writing was used to design the writing modules and various data types were collected and analysed throughout the project.

Two writing modules were designed and implemented to address students' needs at different stages.

Writing Module 1:

My School Picnic
Writing task: Write a reply letter to give suggestions to a friend who is going on a picnic.
Focus:
  • Scaffolding of knowledge, including content ideas, language structures and vocabulary
  • Learning interest
  • Confidence

Writing Module 2:

A Day at the Fun Park
Writing task: In your diary, record your experience and feelings about a day you spent at a fun park
Focus:
  • Presentation of ideas
  • Creativity

Before and after designing and implementing both modules, the teachers took into account various types of data to ensure they could truly address students' needs.

V. Assessment

  1. TSA data analysis
  2. Pre- and post- project questionnaires for teachers
  3. Pre- and post- project questionnaires for students
  4. Lesson observations
  5. Periodic reviews between researcher and teachers on curriculum planning and L/T strategies adopted (reflection logs 1234)
  6. Students' work analysis

Copyright © 2022 Language Learning Support Section, Education Bureau. All rights reserved.